ALCA Report Highlights Mixed Progress on Private Land Conservation for 30×30 Target

Overview

Australia has less than four years to meet its commitment to protect 30% of land and inland waters by 2030, and a new report from the Australian Land Conservation Alliance (ALCA), published on 31 March 2026, indicates that progress is deeply uneven. The report provides a detailed cross-jurisdictional assessment of government action on private land conservation and finds that while some meaningful initiatives have been announced, the overall policy response remains insufficient to deliver the scale of protection required. With privately managed land accounting for approximately 60% of Australia’s total landmass, the trajectory of the national 30×30 target will be determined largely by what happens on private property, not in national parks.

The report identifies several genuinely positive developments, including the Commonwealth’s $250 million Australian Bushland Program, continued federal support for state-based conservation covenants, and the ongoing development of a ‘Protect and Conserve’ method under the Nature Repair Market. It is important to note that this method remains under design and development and has not yet been approved or released for use. The Nature Repair Market itself opened progressively from late 2023 following the passage of the Nature Repair Market Act 2023, with its first approved biodiversity method becoming operational in March 2025. Further methods, including ‘Protect and Conserve’, are in the pipeline but represent future capacity rather than present delivery mechanisms.

For environmental consultants, ecologists, land managers, rural landholders, and corporate property owners, the ALCA report signals a structural shift in how biodiversity conservation is funded and managed in Australia. Private land conservation is moving from a voluntary, goodwill-driven activity into an emerging funded sector with formal market mechanisms, legislative underpinning, and increasingly significant government investment attached to it. Understanding where the policy gaps remain and what frameworks are actually operational is essential for practitioners advising clients on land use decisions, conservation covenant obligations, and natural capital market opportunities.

Key details of the ALCA report and the 30×30 policy framework

The 30×30 target derives from Australia’s commitments under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which was agreed at COP15 in December 2022. The framework commits signatory nations to effectively protecting and conserving at least 30% of terrestrial areas and inland waters by 2030. Australia formalised this commitment domestically through the Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Plan and broader biodiversity strategy reforms. As of the ALCA report date, Australia’s formal protected area estate covers well under 30% of the continent’s land surface, meaning a substantial proportion of the remaining required coverage must come from private and Indigenous land conservation arrangements rather than the expansion of public reserves.

The $250 million Australian Bushland Program represents one of the most substantial federal investments in private land conservation to date. The program is designed to support permanent protection of high-value bushland on private land, providing funding to landholders who commit to conservation covenants or similar binding mechanisms. This is significant because historically, one of the primary barriers to private land conservation has been the financial cost to landholders, particularly those in agricultural areas where permanent protection arrangements may reduce the productive or commercial value of land. The ALCA report welcomes this funding but warns that the quantum is insufficient relative to the scale of land protection needed to contribute meaningfully to the 30×30 target across all jurisdictions.

The Nature Repair Market, established under the Nature Repair Market Act 2023, creates a mechanism for landholders to generate biodiversity certificates by undertaking registered biodiversity projects. These certificates can be purchased by corporations and other parties seeking to offset biodiversity impacts or make voluntary nature-positive commitments. The market structure requires biodiversity projects to be assessed against approved methods, and only one such method had received formal approval as of March 2025. The ‘Protect and Conserve’ method, which is specifically relevant to permanent protection of existing native vegetation and habitat on private land, remains under development. Until this method is approved, landholders seeking to enter the Nature Repair Market for protection-based activities cannot do so through a formally accredited pathway. This creates a timing risk for landholders and investors planning projects around 2030 milestones.

The ALCA report also highlights persistent legislative barriers at the state and territory level that constrain the uptake of conservation covenants. These barriers include inconsistent recognition of covenants across state legislation, variable stamp duty and land tax concessions for covenanted land, and inadequate long-term funding commitments for covenant management and monitoring. In some jurisdictions, conservation covenants are not legally perpetual or are subject to legislative change, which undermines the confidence of landholders, investors, and funding bodies in the permanence of protection outcomes. ALCA has called on state and territory governments to harmonise covenant frameworks and remove these financial disincentives as a priority.

Australian context: private land conservation frameworks and the path to 30×30

Australia’s existing protected area system, which includes national parks, nature reserves, marine parks, and Indigenous Protected Areas, covers a substantial portion of the continent but is geographically concentrated in areas with lower agricultural and commercial land value, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. High-biodiversity landscapes in temperate, coastal, and fertile inland areas remain substantially underrepresented in the formal protected area estate, and it is precisely these landscapes where private land conservation arrangements are most needed and most difficult to secure.

Background and context

The Australian Land Conservation Alliance (ALCA) has released a new report assessing government progress on private land conservation, which is a critical mechanism for achieving Australia’s national target to protect 30% of land and inland waters by 2030 (the "30×30" target). The report reveals a mixed policy landscape across jurisdictions. While ALCA welcomed positive developments—such as the Commonwealth’s $250 million Australian Bushland Program, ongoing federal support for state conservation covenants, and the development of a 'Protect and Conserve' (permanent protection) method under the Nature Repair Market — noting this method remains under design/development and has not yet been approved or released—the report warns that current funding levels and legislative barriers are insufficient to deliver the required scale of protection. With less than four years remaining to meet the 2030 target, ALCA is urging governments to urgently scale up investment and remove financial barriers to private land stewardship.

Why it matters for environmental professionals and their clients

For environmental consultants, ecologists, and land managers, private land conservation is rapidly evolving from a niche activity into a major funded sector. With privately managed land accounting for roughly 60% of Australia's landmass, achieving the 30×30 target will heavily rely on private landholders. The expansion of state conservation covenants and the continued rollout of additional Nature Repair Market methods (the market itself launched in March 2025 with its first approved method; further methods including 'Protect and Conserve' remain in development) will create significant demand for ecological baseline assessments, restoration planning, and ongoing biodiversity monitoring. Consultants who understand these emerging policy frameworks and funding pools will be uniquely positioned to advise rural and corporate landholders on how to unlock private investment and government funding for permanent conservation projects.

[11:00] alca.org.au | ecology | constructive | ALCA Report Highlights Mixed Progress on Private Land Conservation for 30×30 Target

References and related sources

• Primary source: www.alca.org.au
• alca.org.au
• alca.org.au
• https://alca.org.au/private-land-conservation-is-key-to-nature-targets-but-new-r
• EPBC Act

How iEnvi can help

iEnvi provides specialist consulting services relevant to this topic. Our team includes CEnvP Site Contamination Specialists with experience across contaminated land, groundwater, remediation, ecology, and regulatory compliance.

• iEnvi contaminated land investigation services
• iEnvi remediation and validation services
• iEnvi expert services and independent review services

---

This is an iEnvi Machete news summary. Prepared by iEnvi to summarise the source article for contaminated land, groundwater, remediation, approvals and site risk professionals.

Published: 05 Apr 2026

Need advice on this topic? Speak to an iEnvi expert at hello@ienvi.com.au or 1300 043 684, or contact us online.